In the past, Mind’s advocacy activities were focused on contributing to the sector's thinking and debate on program delivery and service innovation.

In 2016, the Mind Board committed to build a larger advocacy program that would seek to influence major debate on issues central to the experiences of people whose lives are impacted by mental ill-health and psychosocial disability.

We are currently working on scoping the key issues that we will seek to influence, and on the approach we will take to our advocacy activities. Understanding what matters to the people, families and communities we work with will be central to our plans. Making sure that people with lived experiences are part of our activities will be a feature of our campaigns .

Although our advocacy agenda is still being developed, we are already active at a national policy and community level. Through our networks and relationships, we stimulate and take part in debate on current policy and system reform issues. We also make submissions to the government and other institutions. We always make sure these activities are informed by our program of research and consultation.


Productivity Commission: Inquiry into the Social and Economic benefits of Improving Mental Health

Productivity Commission: Inquiry into the Social and Economic benefits of Improving Mental Health

Mind presents the following submission to the Productivity Commission Inquiry into the Social and Economic Benefits of Improving Mental Health. We believe this inquiry is a major opportunity to re-evaluate Australia’s mental health policy and service system beyond the historical framing of illness and medical interventions. Failure to give more fundamental consideration to the broader socio economic issues underpinning mental health is one of the reasons why past reform efforts have been met with limited success, despite the considerable policy attention given to the area.

The following submission will address those areas of the Issues Paper where Mind feels it can contribute evidence based policy commentary and practical solutions, several of which we believe are capable of being rapidly scaled up. In particular, our submission focuses on the reforms that are needed to enhance productivity and participation for people with high-medium, high and complex mental health needs.

The submission begins by setting out areas where we feel the draft report should be reframed in order to better realise the Commission’s key aims around education, training and participation. It focuses on the essential components to improving mental health, with an emphasis on what we believe is a mismatch between what the bulk of the health care system is structured to deliver and the actual nature of need for those with mental ill-health, particularly at the serious end of the spectrum, and the workforce best equipped to deliver this. The submission will examine the areas of housing and homelessness, income support, psychosocial disability support services in the context of service gaps in the NDIS, justice, and education, training and government support to find a job.

To read Mind’s full submission to the Commission, click here.

Royal Commission into mental health (Victoria)

Royal Commission into mental health (Victoria)

Mind strongly supports the establishment of a Victorian Royal Commission into mental health (the Commission), and we welcome this opportunity to contribute to the design of the Commission’s terms of reference. We wish to promote a human rights based operational framework, together with ten key recommendations on the scope and process that Mind considers to be of critical importance.

We also wish to acknowledge the complexity involved in managing a public inquiry of this scale. The architecture of the Commission, including the terms of reference (ToR) and the Commission’s governance structures must be sufficiently robust and transparent so as to manage the vast expectations of many Victorians.

Mind’s submission outlines the issues that we believe the Commission should address:

  • Adopt a human rights framework to guide the inquiry
  • Centre the voices of people with experiences of mental ill-health
  • Treat different ways of knowing about mental ill-health and recovery equally
  • Include in scope all social determinants of mental ill-health
  • Examine the impact of State/Commonwealth arrangements on individuals
  • Ensure an equal focus on clinical and community-managed mental health services
  • Explore expanded roles for community-managed mental health services
  • Explore expanded roles for the peer workforce and peer-led services
  • Listen to people’s negative experiences of mental health services
  • Examine the intersections with other concurrent national inquiries

To read Mind's full submission to the Commission, click here.

NDIS should support people with mental health disability

NDIS should support people with mental health disability

The debate about the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) and its suitability for people with severe and persistent mental illness is of concern.

We believe people with mental health disability should be supported through the scheme as it offers the best model for giving people control over their lives.

There are some problems with how the scheme works to accommodate the episodic nature of mental illness and fluctuating support needs. As the scheme evolves and develops, these issues can be ironed out.

We are ready to work with consumers and the NDIA to develop strategies for improving the scheme. We strongly advocate for the NDIS to continue to support people with mental health disability so they can achieve a better life.

Those who miss out on support - due to the shifting of community-based mental health services dollars into the NDIS - is also a big issue. Early intervention and support for those who are recovering from episodes of mental illness is fundamental to preventing disability. We cannot allow a person to struggle without support until ongoing disability emerges.

View Response to the Joint Standing Committee inquiry into the provision of services under the NDIS

View Response to the Productivity Commission inquiry into NDIS costs

Marriage equality plebiscite

Marriage equality plebiscite

Mind is deeply concerned that the marriage equality plebiscite could cause significant damage to the mental health of the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex (LGBTIQ) community.

The campaigns in the lead up to a plebiscite could have a negative and destructive impact on LGBTIQ Australians, especially young people and their families, some of whom are already grappling with mental health issues. 

Stigma around sexuality and gender identity and related exclusion are existing drivers for poor mental health.  

LGBTIQ people have the highest rates of suicidality of any population in Australia. An Australian survey of gender variant and sexually diverse young people found that almost two thirds had experienced homophobia or transphobia, and that more than two in five young people interviewed had had thoughts of self-harm (41%) and/or suicide (42%). (Robinson et al., 2014)

This situation has the potential to worsen dramatically in the context of the negative public campaigning that is likely to occur in the lead up to the plebiscite.

There is strong evidence from other countries that legislating for marriage equality following a public decision-making mechanism had a negative effect. 

Mind supports the immediate legalisation of marriage equality, giving the LGBTIQ community the long awaited recognition of their human rights. Funds saved as a result could be redirected to help underrepresented communities, particularly young people with mental ill-health.

Mind will continue to raise its concerns until such time the decision is finalised. If the plebiscite goes ahead we will support our clients, their families and our staff in the lead up to, during and after the plebiscite.    

Robinson K, Bansel P, Denson N, Ovenden G, Davies C (2014) Growing Up Queer: Issues facing young Australians who are gender variant and sexually diverse. Young and Well Cooperative Research Centre, Melbourne, Australia.

Australian marriage law postal survey

Australian marriage law postal survey

Mind supports marriage equality for all Australians. 

Following the outcome of the High Court’s deliberations, we are disappointed that the Australian marriage law postal survey is going ahead. 

The marriage law postal survey is not just a legal or administrative process. Corrosive and hateful public campaigning has been a feature of public discourse around similar processes across the world. We are already beginning to see these trends here in Australia. The postal survey undermines the human dignity and fundamental human rights of LGBTIQ people across Australia, as well as impacting on their mental health and wellbeing, by exposing them to views that represent them as lesser than other human beings.

Human rights are not granted or taken away by ‘survey’ or other form of vote. Minority rights should never be subject to the whim of the majority. The premise of this process, which is a non-binding survey and does not compel parliament to do anything one way or the other, makes a mockery of established international legal norms, including those which Australia has spent decades advocating abroad. 

As human beings, we all have the right to form our own opinions, and as participants in a parliamentary democracy, we have the right to elect leaders who reflect our values, aspirations, and priorities. It is those leaders who should be addressing this issue. The argument that marriage equality should have a special status within our democracy and therefore be subject to direct democracy suggests that the value we place on LGBTIQ Australians is somehow in doubt. It is not. 

Despite our opposition to a survey process for marriage equality, we believe it is important for people to participate in the survey, particularly if you believe LGBTIQ Australians should have equal rights and status. Mind is committed to equality and human rights protection for all. Every single LGBTIQ person is entitled to the same legal protections and status as everyone else – and that includes the right to get married to the person they love.

Caring Fairly

Caring Fairly

Women smiling and embracing her motherCaring Fairly is a campaign led by unpaid carers, and supported by a coalition of carer support organisations, NGOs and peak bodies. It is coordinated by Mind Australia.

Caring Fairly has invested in leading edge research and produced evidence based policies. We believe that these policies can sustainably advance the economic, social and cultural rights of unpaid carers in Australia, and should be implemented by the Commonwealth Government. The Government has primary responsibility for bringing fairness to care, and for advancing the long-term economic, social and cultural rights of unpaid carers across Australia. 

To do so, it must look beyond short term policies, and invest in long term solutions. It must drive a cultural change in how we as Australians, value the unpaid carers in all our communities.

Visit the Caring Fairly website and learn more.